Succinic anhydrides from epoxides

ABSTRACT

Catalysts and methods for the double carbonylation of epoxides are disclosed. Each epoxide molecule reacts with two molecules of carbon monoxide to produce a succinic anhydride. The reaction is facilitated by catalysts combining a Lewis acidic species with a transition metal carbonyl complex. The double carbonylation is achieved in single process by using reaction conditions under which both carbonylation reactions occur without the necessity of isolating or purifying the product of the first carbonylation.

PRIORITY INFORMATION

The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional No.60/935,845 filed Sep. 4, 2007 and U.S. Provisional No. 61/040,944 filedMar. 31, 2008. The entire contents of these priority applications areincorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. NSF0243605, awarded by the National Science Foundation and/or Grant No. DOEDE-FG02-05ER15687, awarded by the Department of Energy. The governmenthas certain rights in the invention.

BACKGROUND

Succinic anhydrides are valuable reactive intermediates that find use inan array of applications.

For example, their copolymerization with epoxides or diols yieldsbiodegradable polyesters. Anhydrides are also useful intermediates inorganic synthesis, since they can be readily ring opened to diacids orother succinate derivatives; some examples of which include biologicallyactive natural products, pharmaceuticals, and metalloproteaseinhibitors.

Substituted succinic anhydrides have previously been synthesized by anumber of methods, most often by the dehydration of the correspondingdiacid or from maleic anhydride via Diels-Alder or Ene reactions. Theyhave also been made by metal catalyzed carbonylation of alkynes,alkenoic acids, and lactones; however, most of these catalytic reactionsproceeded either in low yield, with significant side products, orwithout demonstrating substrate generality or product stereochemicalpurity. Thus, the development of more efficient and stereoselectivesyntheses remains an important goal.

As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,852,865 our group has developed a classof well-defined bimetallic catalysts of the general type [Lewisacid]⁺[M(CO)_(x)]⁻ for the ring-expanding carbonylation of strainedheterocycles. We have found that related catalysts can carbonylateβ-lactones to succinic anhydrides in high yields while preservingstereochemical purity. Given the many syntheses of enantiomerically pureepoxides and the recent advances in epoxide carbonylation to β-lactones,subsequent carbonylation of these lactones constitutes a versatiletwo-step method for the stereoselective synthesis of succinic anhydrides(Scheme 1).

This method would be far more synthetically useful if the two stepscould be consolidated, eliminating the requirement for isolation andpurification of potentially toxic lactone intermediates, saving time andcatalyst, and increasing overall yield. The present invention providessuch a methodology.

SUMMARY

The double carbonylation of epoxides whereby each epoxide moleculereacts with two molecules of carbon monoxide to produce a succinicanhydride is facilitated by the catalysts and conditions of the presentinvention. The double carbonylation is achieved in a single processusing reaction conditions under which both carbonylation reactions canoccur without the necessity of isolating or purifying the product of thefirst carbonylation.

Using known catalysts and conditions, a useful process according toScheme 2 has previously been unachievable since the two steps (lactoneformation from an epoxide and anhydride formation from a lactone) werefound to have different and often mutually exclusive reactionrequirements. One aspect of the present invention encompassescatalyst/solvent combinations that enable this process to succeed in asingle pot reaction format.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 illustrates the results of double carbonylation experiments usingcatalyst 1c in different solvents. Reaction conditions: 2 mmol epoxidein 1 mL solvent, 0.2 mol % catalyst 1c , 850 psi CO, 2 h, 90° C. Productdistribution determined by ¹H NMR spectrum of crude reaction mixture.Epoxide was completely converted to lactone (not shown) in all of thesesolvents; subsequent conversion of lactone to anhydride (black) andpolymer (gray) is shown.

FIG. 2A illustrates the structure of certain catalysts used in theexperiments that are summarized in FIG. 2B.

FIG. 2B illustrates the results of double carbonylation experiments in1,4-dioxane using different catalysts. Reaction conditions: 2 mmol1,2-epoxybutane in 1 mL dioxane, 0.2 mol % catalyst, 850 psi CO, 2 h,90° C. Product distribution determined by ¹H NMR spectrum of crudereaction mixture. All catalysts, except Cp₂Ti, completely convertedepoxide to lactone (not shown). Subsequent conversion of lactone toanhydride (black) and polymer (gray) for other catalysts is shown.

FIG. 3 compares the relative initial rates for epoxide (gray) andlactone (black) carbonylation using catalyst 1c as a function ofsolvent. Reactions monitored with in situ IR spectroscopy (v_(C═O)=1827cm⁻¹). [PO]₀=1.0 M or [BBL]₀=1.0 M, [catalyst 1c]=2.0 mM, P_(CO)=850psi, T=40° C.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS

The present invention provides catalysts and methods that enable thedouble carbonylation of epoxides to provide succinic anhydride products.In general, the double carbonylation is performed in a solvent whichincludes a Lewis base. In certain embodiments, the Lewis base can be theepoxide (i.e., the reaction is performed in neat epoxide). In certainembodiments, the Lewis base is distinct from the epoxide. While methodsthat produce high crude yields of succinic anhydride are most useful(e.g., at least 50%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least95%, etc.), the present invention also encompasses methods that generatelower crude yields (e.g., at least 10%, at least 20%, etc.).

Epoxides

The methods are generally applicable and a wide range of epoxidestarting materials can be used. The epoxide substrates (and by extensionthe lactone intermediates and anhydride products) may be unsubstituted(i.e., ethylene oxide) or may be monosubstituted, vicinallydisubstituted (either cis or trans). The methods can also be applied togeminally disubstituted, trisubstituted or tetrasubstituted epoxidesthough these substrates react more slowly and tend to give lower yieldsof anhydride. The substituent(s) on the epoxide can be any that iscompatible with the reaction conditions described herein.

In certain embodiments, the epoxide has the formula I:

The R group and any other chemical variable appearing in the Schemes andstructures described herein encompass those chemical moieties andfunctional groups that would be recognized by one having skill in theart of organic chemistry as being compatible with the structure andfunction of the molecules bearing those chemical variables. Exemplaryfunctional groups include substituted and unsubstituted cyclic andacyclic hydrocarbon moieties, substituted and unsubstituted cyclic andacyclic heteroatom-containing moieties, as well as common functionalgroups comprising heteroatoms, halogens, and metalloid elements. Tofurther define the range of suitable groups certain definitions areprovided below. Nonetheless, it is to be understood that thesedefinitions are meant to be representative and the absence of a specificgroup or moiety in the definitions below is not necessarily meant toexclude such groups or to imply that such a group is not encompassed bythe present invention.

In any case where a chemical variable is shown attached to a bond thatcrosses a bond of ring (for example as shown for R above, R^(d) incertain ligands below, etc.), this means that one or more such variablesare optionally attached to the ring having the crossed bond. Each Rgroup on such a ring can be attached at any suitable position, this isgenerally understood to mean that the group is attached in place of ahydrogen atom on the parent ring. This includes the possibility that twoR groups can be attached to the same ring atom. Furthermore, when morethan one R group is present on a ring, each may be the same or differentthan other R groups attached thereto, and each group is definedindependently of other groups that may be attached elsewhere on the samemolecule, even though they may be represented by the same identifier.

In one embodiment of the epoxides of formula I, each R group can beindependently selected from the group consisting of: (a) C₁ to C₂₀alkyl; (b) C₂ to C₂₀ alkenyl; (c) C₂ to C₂₀ alkynyl; (d) up to a C₁₂carbocycle; (e) up to a C₁₂ heterocycle; (f) —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); and(g) a polymer chain. Two or more R groups may be taken together with thecarbon atoms to which they are attached to form one or more rings, andany of (a) through (e) may optionally be further substituted with one ormore F groups.

F at each occurrence can be independently selected from the groupconsisting of: halogen; —OR¹⁰; —OC(O)R¹³; —OC(O)OR¹³; —OC(O)NR¹¹R¹²;—CN; —CNO; —C(O)R¹³; —C(O)OR¹³; —C(O)NR¹¹R¹²; —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z));—NR¹¹C(O)R¹⁰; —NR¹¹C(O)OR¹⁰; —NCO; —NR¹²SO₂R¹³; —S(O)_(x)R¹³;—S(O)₂NR¹¹R¹²; —NO₂; —N₃; —(CH₂)_(k)R¹⁴; —(CH₂)_(k)-Z-R¹⁶; and—(CH₂)_(k)-Z-(CH₂)_(m)-R¹⁴.

R¹⁰ at each occurrence can be independently selected from the groupconsisting of: —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); C₁ to C₁₂ alkyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkenyl;C₂ to C₁₂ alkynyl; up to a C₁₂ carbocycle; up to a C₁₂ heterocycle;—S(O)₂R¹³; —Si(R¹⁵)₃; —H; and a hydroxyl protecting group.

R¹¹ and R¹² at each occurrence can be independently selected from thegroup consisting of: —H; C₁ to C₁₂ alkyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂ to C₁₂alkynyl; and —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)). R¹¹ and R¹²; when both present, canoptionally be taken together with the atom to which they are attached toform a 3- to 10-membered ring.

R¹³ at each occurrence can be independently selected from the groupconsisting of: —H; C₁ to C₁₂ alkyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂ to C₁₂alkynyl; up to a C₁₂ carbocycle; and up to a C₁₂ heterocycle.

R¹⁴ at each occurrence can be independently selected from the groupconsisting of: halogen; —OR¹⁰; —OC(O)R¹³; —OC(O)OR¹³; —OC(O)NR¹¹R¹²;—CN; —CNO; —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); —C(O)R¹³; —C(O)OR¹³; —C(O)NR¹¹R¹²;—NR¹¹C(O)R¹³; —NR¹¹C(O)OR¹⁰; —NR¹¹SO₂R¹³; —NCO; —N₃; —NO₂; —S(O)_(x)R¹³;—SO₂NR¹¹R¹²; up to a C₁₂ heterocycle; and up to a C₁₂ carbocycle.

R¹⁵ at each occurrence can be independently selected from the groupconsisting of: C₁ to C₆ alkyl; C₂ to C₆ alkenyl; C₂ to C₆ alkynyl; andup to C₁₂ substituted or unsubstituted carbocycle.

R¹⁶ at each occurrence can be independently selected from the groupconsisting of: C₁ to C₁₂ alkyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkynyl; upto a C₁₂ heterocycle; up to a C₁₂ carbocycle; and —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)).

Z is a divalent linker and can be selected from the group consisting of:—(CH═CH)_(a)—; —(CH≡CH)_(a)—; —C(O)—; —C(═NOR¹¹)—; —C(═NNR¹¹R¹²)—; —O—;—N(R¹¹)—; —N(C(O)R¹³)—; —S(O)_(x)—; a polyether; and a polyamine.

a can be 1, 2, 3, or 4.

k can be an integer from 1 to 8 inclusive.

m can be an integer from 1 to 8 inclusive.

x can be 0, 1, or 2.

z can be 1, 2, or 3.

It is to be understood that the present invention encompasses the use ofepoxides which comprise any combination of these variable definitions.For example, as discussed in Example 4 and Table 2 below, we haveapplied the methods to the following representative unsubstituted andmonosubstituted epoxides: ethylene oxide (4), propylene oxide (6),1,2-epoxybutane (8); 1,2-epoxyhexane (10); 1,2-epoxydodecane (12);cyclohexyl oxirane (14); n-butyl glycidyl ether (16);tert-butyldimethylsilyl glycidyl ether (18); benzyl glycidyl ether (20);10,11-epoxyundecan-1-ol (22); 4,5-epoxypentyl butyrate (24);5,6-epoxyhexanenitrile (26); N,N-dimethyl-10,11-undecylamide (28);1,2-epoxy-5-hexene (30); 1,2-epoxy-7-octene (32);(2,3-epoxypropyl)benzene (34); styrene oxide (36); and1,2,7,8-diepoxyoctane (38). Ethylene oxide (4) and propylene oxide (6)are of particular commercial interest.

As discussed in Example 4 and Table 3 below, we have also applied themethods to the following representative disubstituted epoxides:cis-2,3-epoxybutane (40); trans-2,3-epoxybutane (42);trans-3,4-epoxyhexane (44); and trans-2,3-epoxyoctane (46).

As discussed in Example 4 and Table 4 below, we have also applied themethods to the following representative enantiomeric epoxides:(R)-propylene oxide ((R)-6); (S)-1,2-epoxyhexane ((S)-10); and(R)-benzyl glycidyl ether ((R)-20).

These representative epoxides demonstrate that the methods areapplicable to a range of substituted epoxide substrates including thosecontaining ethers, alcohols, esters, amides, nitriles, silyl ethers,alkenes and aromatics. It is to be understood that these lists are notexhaustive, other functional groups can also be present, for exampleketone and acetal substituted epoxides have been successfully employed.

Catalysts

The present invention encompasses the use of carbonylation catalystscomprising a Lewis acid in combination with a transition metal carbonylcomplex. The term Lewis acid as used herein refers to any electrophilicspecies that is capable of accepting an electron pair and that is not aBrønsted-Lowry acid.

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula[Lewis acid]^(u+){[QT(CO)_(v)]^(s−)}^(t) where Q is any ligand and neednot be present; T is a transition metal; u is an integer from 1 to 6inclusive; s is an integer from 1 to 4 inclusive; t is a number suchthat t multiplied by s equals u; and v is an integer from 1 to 9inclusive. For example, in one embodiment u and s are both 1. In anotherembodiment u and s are both 2. In certain embodiments, v is an integerfrom 1 to 4 inclusive. In one embodiment, v is 4.

Lewis Acids

In certain embodiments, the Lewis acid portion of the catalyst includesan element from groups 3 through 14 of the periodic table or contains alanthanide metal. Useful Lewis acids may either be neutral (e.g.,compounds such as AlCl₃, CrCl₂, CrCl₃, ZnCl₂, BF₃, BCl₃, Yb(OTf)₃,FeCl₂, FeCl₃, CoCl₂, etc.) or cationic (for instance, metal complexes ofthe formula [M(L)_(b)]^(c+) where M is a metal, each L is a ligand, b isan integer from 1 to 6 inclusive, and c is 1, 2, or 3, and where, ifmore than one L is present, each L may be the same or different). Abroad array of metallo Lewis acids have been found applicable to thepresent invention. In certain embodiments, M is a transition metal, agroup 13 or 14 metal, or a lanthanide. Transition metals and group 13metals are of particular interest. For example, in certain embodiments,M is aluminum, chromium, indium or gallium. In some embodiments, M isaluminum or chromium.

Similarly, a range of ligands (L) can be present in the metallo Lewisacid component of the catalyst. In certain embodiments the ligand can bea dianionic tetradentate ligand.

Suitable ligands include, but are not limited to: porphyrin derivatives1, salen derivatives 2, dibenzotetramethyltetraaza[14]annulene (tmtaa)derivatives 3, phthalocyaninate derivatives 4, and derivatives of theTrost ligand 5. In certain embodiments, porphyrin, salen and tmtaaderivatives are of particular utility. In some cases, a mixture of morethan one Lewis acid component can be present in the catalyst. Exemplarydefinitions for the R groups appearing in structures 1 through 5 aremore fully described below.

In certain embodiments, the metal complex includes a metal M and aligand L of formula 1:

where R^(d) at each occurrence is independently selected from the groupconsisting of: —H; C₁-C₁₂ alkyl; C₂-C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂-C₁₂ alkynyl;halogen; —OR¹⁰; —OC(O)R¹³; —OC(O)OR¹³; —OC(O)NR¹¹R¹²; —CN; —CNO;—C(O)R¹³; —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); —C(O)OR¹³; —C(O)NR¹¹R¹²; —NR¹¹R¹²;—NR¹¹C(O)R¹⁰; —NR¹¹C(O)OR¹³; —NR¹¹SO₂R¹³; —NCO; —N₃; —NO₂; —S(O)_(x)R¹³;—SO₂NR¹¹R¹²; —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); —(CH₂)_(k)R¹⁴; —(CH₂)_(k)-Z-R¹⁶—; and—(CH₂)_(k)-Z-(CH₂)_(m)-R¹⁴, and

where R¹⁰, R¹¹, R¹², R¹³, R¹⁴, R¹⁶, Z, k, m, x, and z are as definedabove.

In certain embodiments, the metal complex includes a metal M and aligand L of formula 2:

where R¹ and R¹′ are independently selected from the group consistingof: —H; C₁ to C₁₂ alkyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkynyl;—C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); —(CH₂)_(k)R¹⁴; and —(CH₂)_(k)-Z-R¹⁴,

where R², R²′, R³, and R³′ are independently selected from the groupconsisting of: (i) C₁-C₁₂ alkyl; (ii) C₂-C₁₂ alkenyl; (iii) C₂-C₁₂alkynyl; (iv) up to a C₁₂ carbocycle; (v) up to a C₁₂ heterocycle; (vi)—(CH₂)_(k)R¹⁴; (vii) R²⁰; and (viii) —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)),

where each of (i) through (v) may optionally be further substituted withone or more R²⁰ groups; and where R² and R³, and R²′ and R³′ mayoptionally be taken together with the carbon atoms to which they areattached to form one or more rings which may in turn be substituted withone or more R²⁰ groups; and

where R⁴ is selected from the group consisting of:

-   -   where X is a divalent linker selected from the group consisting        of: —N(R¹¹)—; —O—; —S(O)_(x)—; —(CH₂)_(k)—; —C(O)—; —C(═NOR¹⁰)—;        —C(R^(c))₂—; a polyether; a C₃ to C₈ substituted or        unsubstituted carbocycle; and a C₁ to C₈ substituted or        unsubstituted heterocycle,    -   where R^(d) is as defined above,    -   where R^(c) at each occurrence is independently selected from        the group consisting of: (a) C₁-C₁₂ alkyl; (b) C₂-C₁₂        alkenyl, (c) C₂-C₁₂ alkynyl; (e) up to a C₁₂ carbocycle, (f) up        to a C₁₂ heterocycle; (g) R²⁰; and (h) —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z));        -   where two or more R^(c) groups may be taken together with            the carbon atoms to which they are attached to form one or            more rings,        -   where when two R^(c) groups are attached to the same carbon            atom, they may be taken together to form a moiety selected            from the group consisting of: a 3- to 8-membered spirocyclic            ring; a carbonyl (C═O), an oxime (C═NOR¹⁰); a hydrazone            (C═NNR¹¹R¹²); an imine (C═NR¹¹); and an alkenyl group            (C═CR¹¹R¹²), and        -   where any of (a) through (f) may optionally be further            substituted with one or more R²⁰ groups,

where R²⁰ at each occurrence is independently selected from the groupconsisting of: —H; halogen; —OR¹⁰; —OC(O)R¹³; 'OC(O)OR¹³; —OC(O)NR¹¹R¹²;—CN; —CNO; —C(O)R¹³; —C(O)OR¹³; —C(O)NR¹¹R¹²; —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z));—NR¹¹R¹²; —NR¹¹C(O)R¹⁰; —NR¹¹C(O)OR¹⁰; —NCO; —NR¹²SO₂R¹³; —S(O)_(x)R¹³;—S(O)₂NR¹¹R¹²; —NO₂; —N₃; —(CH₂)_(k)R¹⁴; —(CH₂)_(k)-Z-R¹⁶; and—(CH₂)_(k)-Z-(CH₂)_(m)-R¹⁴, and

where R¹⁰, R¹¹, R¹², R¹³, R¹⁴, R¹⁶, Z, k, m, x, and z are as definedabove.

In certain embodiments, the metal complex includes a metal M and aligand L of formula 3:

where R^(d) is as defined above,

where R¹ at each occurrence is independently selected from the groupconsisting of: —H; C₁ to C₁₂ alkyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂ to C₁₂alkynyl; —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); —(CH₂)_(k)R¹⁴; and —(CH₂)_(k)-Z-R¹⁴, and

where R¹³, R¹⁴, Z, k, and z are as defined above.

In certain embodiments, the metal complex includes a metal M and aligand L of formula 4:

where R^(d) is as defined above.

In certain embodiments, the metal complex includes a metal M and aligand L of formula 5:

where R^(c) and R^(d) are as defined above.

Transition Metal Carbonyl Complexes

The transition metal carbonyl complex included in the catalyst may beneutral or anionic. In certain embodiments, the metal carbonyl complexis anionic, e.g., monoanionic carbonyl complexes of metals from groups5, 7 or 9 of the periodic table or dianionic carbonyl complexes ofmetals from groups 4 or 8 of the periodic table. In certain embodiments,the metal carbonyl complex contains a metal from groups 7 or 9 of theperiodic table, e.g., cobalt, manganese or rhodium. Examples of suitableanionic metal carbonyl complexes include, but are not limited to:[Co(CO)₄]⁻ and [Mn(CO)₅]⁻. In certain embodiments [Co(CO)₄]⁻ may beused. In some cases, a mixture of two or more transition metal carbonylcomplexes can be present in the catalyst.

While the metal carbonyl complexes disclosed herein are generally binarymetal carbonyl complexes (i.e., they have the formula M(CO)_(v) andconsist only of a metal and carbonyl ligands) this is not a limitingrequirement of the present invention, and the use of mixed ligand metalcarbonyl complexes is also contemplated. For example, a bidentatephosphine ligand may be present along with the carbonyl ligands. It isalso anticipated that under some reaction conditions, mixed ligandcarbonyl complexes may be formed in situ from the binary complexesduring the reaction. Whether added or formed in situ, catalystscontaining mixed ligand carbonyl complexes are encompassed by thepresent invention.

The stoichiometry of the Lewis acid and the metal carbonyl complexcomponents of the catalyst encompassed by the present invention can bevaried. Typically, the two components are present in a ratio thatbalances the charges of the two species. For example, if the Lewis acidis a monocation and the metal carbonyl complex is a dianion, then theycan be present in a charge-balancing ratio of 2:1 (i.e., 2 [Lewisacid]⁺+[M(CO)_(x)]²⁻). In some cases, if the charge of the carbonylcomplex exceeds that of the Lewis acid component—either because there isa stoichiometric excess of the former, or because the Lewis acid is aneutral species—then the excess negative charge of the carbonyl complexcan be balanced by the presence of a group 1 or 2 metal cation, or by anon-metallic cation such as an ammonium, phosphonium, or arsoniumcation.

In some cases, the metal atom of the metallo Lewis acid can becoordinated to one or more additional neutral coordinating ligands (forinstance to satisfy the metal atom's coordination valence) one suchligand that is particularly preferred is tetrahydrofuran (THF), it willbe understood however that many other solvents and other ligands such asare well known in the art may also fulfill this role without departingfrom the present invention. It will also be realized that under reactionconditions, the coordinating ligands can be replaced by reagents,products, intermediates or solvents that may be present. Such insitu-generated species are also encompassed by the present invention. Aswith many catalytic processes, the structure of the specific catalystadded to the reaction will not always be the active species.

In a related vein, catalysts suitable for the processes of the presentinvention can be formed in situ from individual components. For example,the Lewis acid and the metal carbonyl complex can be added separately tothe reaction vessel in which the reaction is performed. In one specificexample of this, instead of adding aluminumtetrakis-(4-chlorophenyl)-porphine bis-tetrahydrofurantetracarbonylcobaltate (1c) as the catalyst, one can separately addaluminum tetrakis-(4-chlorophenyl)-porphine chloride and sodiumtetracarbonyl cobaltate. In a similar procedure, an aluminum porphyrintetrafluoroborate compound (TPP(Al)⁺BF₄ ⁻) was combined in situ withbis(triphenylphosphine)iminium tetracarbonyl cobaltate (PPN⁺Co(CO)₄ ⁻)to provide the active catalyst. It is thus to be understood that suchcombinations of reagents that will produce a Lewis acid/metal carbonylpair in situ are within the scope of the present invention.

Without wishing to be bound by any theory or to thereby limit the scopeof the invention, it is believed that catalysts combining a Lewis acidcomponent that is cationic and a metal carbonyl complex that is anionicare particularly suitable for carbonylation processes of the presentinvention. It is further believed that Lewis acid/metal carbonylcombinations that have a propensity to form non-ionic associations maybe less effective (for instance if a covalent or coordinate covalentbond is prone to form between the metals of the two components). In suchcases it can be advantageous to add additional components that preventthis association. As one example, when the Lewis acid component is basedon an indium porphyrin complex, and the metal carbonyl component istetracarbonyl cobaltate, the carbonylation reaction is improved byaddition of triphenylphosphine. Again without being bound by theory orthereby limiting the scope of the present invention, the phosphine isbelieved to coordinate with the indium and thereby disrupt itspropensity to bind to the cobaltate component of the catalyst.

In some cases, it has been found advantageous to have an excess of thetransition metal carbonyl component of the catalyst present in thereaction mixture. For instance, the metal carbonyl complex can bepresent in an excess ranging from about 2-fold to about 10-fold. Ifthere is an excess of an anionic metal carbonyl complex relative to theLewis acid, then the negative charge can be balanced as described above,the excess negative charge is balanced by the presence of an alkali oralkaline earth metal.

Below we present the structures of some exemplary catalysts that can beused in methods of the present invention.

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 1a,1b, 1c, 1d, 1e or 1f:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 1g:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 1h:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 1i,1j, 1k, 1l, 1m or 1n:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 1o:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 1p:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 2aor 2b:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 2cor 2d:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 2e:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 2f:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 3a:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 3b:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 4a:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 4b:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 5a:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 5b:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 7a:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 7b:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 9:

In certain embodiments, the catalyst comprises a complex of formula 10:

Additional examples of carbonylation catalysts can be found in U.S. Pat.No. 6,852,865, and in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/820,958 and11/705,528; the entirety of each of which are hereby incorporated hereinby reference.

Turning now to a more detailed description of the invention, it has beenfound that the catalysts described above can be used to successfullytransform epoxides into succinic anhydride derivatives in a singlereaction (i.e., in a single reaction vessel under one set of reactionconditions). Several aspects of the reaction conditions have been foundto affect the outcome (e.g., the yield) of these processes including,but not limited to: the presence of a solvent, the concentration of thesubstrate, the amount of catalyst present, and the pressure andtemperature at which the reaction is performed.

With respect to solvents, methods of the invention have been found to beimproved by the presence of a solvent which includes a Lewis base. Theterm Lewis base as used herein refers to any nucleophilic species thatis capable of donating an electron pair. As demonstrated in theExamples, we have found that the presence of suitable solvents cansuppress the formation of polymeric side products and, in some cases,increase the rate and/or yield of the reaction.

In certain embodiments, the Lewis base is distinct from the epoxide. Inother embodiments, the Lewis base is the epoxide (i.e., the reaction isperformed in neat epoxide). Indeed, while the use of non-epoxidesolvents may lead to higher yields, we have found that certain catalystsallow double carbonylation to be achieved in neat epoxide.

In certain embodiments, the solvent used will fully dissolve the epoxidesubstrate and provide a reaction mixture in which the catalyst employedis at least partially soluble. Suitable solvents may include ethers,ketones, aromatic hydrocarbons, halocarbons, esters, nitriles, and somealcohols. For example, without limitation, a suitable solvent mayinclude: 1,4-dioxane; tetrahydrofuran; tetrahydropyran; dimethoxyethane;glyme; diethyl ether; t-butyl methyl ether; 2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran; ethyl acetate; propyl acetate; butyl acetate; acetone;2-butanone; cyclohexanone; toluene; acetonitrile; and difluorobenzene.In some embodiments, the solvent includes 1,4-dioxane, toluene, and/ordimethoxyethane. In one embodiment, solvent includes 1,4-dioxane.Mixtures of two or more of the above solvents are also useful, and insome cases may be preferred to a single solvent. For example, mixturesof toluene and 1,4-dioxane are useful.

In certain embodiments, we have found that Lewis bases of low tomoderate polarity improve the performance of the reaction over polarsolvents. Thus, in certain embodiments, the solvent may include a Lewisbase which is less polar than 1,3-dioxane (ε=dielectric constant at 20C=13.6). In certain embodiments, the solvent includes a Lewis base whichis less polar than ortho-difluorobenzene (ε=13). In certain embodiments,the solvent includes a Lewis base which is less polar thanmeta-difluorobenzene (ε=5). In certain embodiments, the solvent includesa Lewis base with substantially the same polarity as 1,4-dioxane(ε=2.2).

In certain embodiments, we have found that Lewis bases of low tomoderate electron donicity improve the performance of the reaction overstrongly donating Lewis bases. Thus, in certain embodiments, the solventmay include a Lewis base with lower electron donicity thantetrahydrofuran. In certain embodiments, the solvent may include a Lewisbase with lower electron donicity than 2-methyltetrahydrofuran. Incertain embodiments, the solvent may include a Lewis base with lowerelectron donicity than 2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran. In certainembodiments, the solvent may include a Lewis base with higher electrondonicity than difluorobenzene. In certain embodiments, the solvent mayinclude a Lewis base with higher electron donicity than toluene. Incertain embodiments, the solvent may include a Lewis base withsubstantially the same electron donicity as 1,4-dioxane.

It will be appreciated that while 1,4-dioxane appears to produceparticularly high yields of anhydride when used in combination withvarious catalysts that are described in the Examples, other solvents andmixtures of solvents (including solvents and mixtures that are notexplicitly disclosed) may be used with these catalysts. While some ofthese combinations may produce lower yields they remain within the scopeof the present invention. It will also be appreciated that presentinvention is in no way limited to the representative catalysts that areexemplified in this application. In particular, now that we havedemonstrated that high yield double carbonylation is possible throughappropriate selection of catalyst and solvent, those skilled in the artwill recognize that our teachings can be generalized to othercatalyst/solvent combinations.

In general, highly polar, reactive or protic solvents are generallyinferior or unsuitable for processes of the present invention. Inferiorsolvents include ionic liquids, chlorinated hydrocarbons, sulfolane,dimethylsulfoxide, formamide, pyridine, and the like. The solvent ispreferably added in an amount sufficient to achieve an epoxideconcentration of from about 0.1M to about 20M, for example from about0.1M to about 5M or about from 0.5M to about 2M.

In certain embodiments, the reaction is conducted under a carbonmonoxide atmosphere at a pressure from about 40 psi, to about 2500 psi.For example the carbon monoxide pressure may range from about 80 psi toabout 1000 psi or from about 200 psi to about 800 psi. Optionally, theatmosphere under which the reaction is conducted can include othergasses. Such other gasses can include, for example, hydrogen, methane,nitrogen, carbon dioxide, air, and trace amounts of steam. The presentinvention also specifically encompasses processes in which other carbonmonoxide-containing gas streams provide the atmosphere under which thereaction is conducted, the use of syngas, wood gas, or other carbonmonoxide-containing industrial gas streams are specifically included.

Turning next to the effect of temperature, in certain embodiments thereaction temperature was found to affect the rate and outcome ofprocesses of the invention. At higher temperatures the reaction proceedsmore quickly than at lower temperatures, but the propensity to formreaction by-products increases. In particular, the production of ketoneformed by isomerization of the epoxide substrate was found to increasewith increasing temperature. This undesirable side-product can beminimized at higher reaction temperatures by performing the reaction atrelatively high carbon monoxide pressures. In some cases therefore, theoptimal temperature will be dependent upon the pressure at which thereaction is conducted. At high carbon monoxide pressures, e.g., greaterthan about 400 psi, elevated temperatures were found to be advantageousfor the reaction (e.g., up to about 120 C). In some cases, the reactionmay be conducted at a temperature ranging from about 40 C to about 80 C.To avoid ketone formation, the reaction mixture may be pressurized withCO while at a low temperature (e.g., <0 C) and heating is introducedonly after CO has been allowed to contact the reaction mixture. Ifminimization of ketone is desired, the CO pressure may be applied for aperiod of time prior to heating the mixture (e.g., at least 5 minutesprior to heating).

Turning next to the catalysts, the catalyst is preferably present in anamount sufficient to allow the reaction process to be completed in aconvenient time interval (e.g. less than about 24 hours, for exampleless than about 3 hours). In real terms this can require catalystloadings ranging from about 0.0001 mole percent to about 20 mole percentbased on the epoxide substrate. In certain embodiments, the catalystloading can range from about 0.0001 mole percent to about 1 molepercent, e.g., from about 0.0001 mole percent to about 0.1 mole percentor from about 0.0001 mole percent to about 0.01 mole percent. In certainembodiments, the catalyst loading can range from about 0.001 molepercent to about 20 mole percent, e.g., from about 0.1 mole percent toabout 1 mole percent or from about 0.067 mole percent to about 5 molepercent. In some embodiments, the catalyst loading is less than about0.154 mole percent based on the epoxide substrate. In one suchembodiment, the epoxide is ethylene oxide.

DEFINITIONS

The term ‘carbocycle’ as used herein means a saturated, unsaturated oraromatic ring system where all atoms comprising the ring(s) are carbonatoms. The term includes structures having more than one ring, such asfused ring systems, bridged ring systems and spirocycles. Carbocyclescan include the carbon atoms of keto, imine, and oxime groups and can besubstituted with one or more additional groups. If a specific number ofcarbons is recited with a specific appearance of the term carbocycle(e.g., ‘up to C₁₂ carbocycle’), it is to be understood that the numberrefers only to those carbon atoms comprising the ring system and doesnot include any carbon atoms in substituents that may optionally beattached thereto.

The term ‘heterocycle’ as used herein means a saturated, unsaturated, oraromatic ring structure where one or more atoms in the ring is aheteroatom. The term includes structures having more than one ring, suchas fused ring systems, bridged ring systems and spirocycles. The ringscan also include the carbon atoms of keto, imine, and oxime groups andcan be substituted with one or more additional groups. If a specificnumber of carbons is recited with a specific appearance of the termheterocycle (e.g., ‘up to C₁₂ heterocycle’), it is to be understood thatthe number refers only to those carbon atoms comprising the ring systemand does not include any carbon atoms in substituents that mayoptionally be attached thereto.

The term ‘alkyl’ as used herein means a branched or straight chainsaturated hydrocarbon radical. The term is also meant to encompass alkylgroups where one or more hydrogen atoms are replaced by a halogen atom.Examples of alkyl groups include, but are not limited to: methyl, ethyl,n-propyl, n-hexyl, isobutyl, t-butyl, thexyl, 2-methyl pentyl,dichloromethyl, fluoromethyl, trifluoromethyl, pentafluoropropyl, andn-decyl.

The term ‘alkenyl’ as used herein means a branched or unbranched, mono-or poly-unsaturated hydrocarbon radical having one or more carbon-carbondouble bonds. Each double bond can be substituted or unsubstituted, andcan have cis or trans stereochemistry. The double bonds ofpolyunsaturated radicals can be conjugated or unconjugated and caninclude allenes. The term is also meant to encompass alkenyl groupswhere one or more hydrogen atoms are replaced by a halogen atom.Examples of alkenyl groups include, but are not limited to: vinyl,allyl, isoprenyl, cis-hex-3-enyl, trans-hex-3-enyl, trans, transbutane-1,3-dienyl, 3,3 dimethyl allenyl, 4-methyl hex-1-enyl,cis-but-2-enyl, and 4-methyl-1-hexenyl.

The term ‘alkenyl’ as used herein means a branched or unbranched, mono-or poly-unsaturated hydrocarbon radical having one or more carbon-carbontriple bonds. The term is also meant to encompass alkenyl groups whereone or more hydrogen atoms are replaced by a halogen atom. Examples ofalkynes include, but are not limited to propargyl, 2-butynyl, 5-hexynyl,and 2,2 dimethyl-3-butynyl.

Where a substituent is defined to encompass alkenyl or alkynylsubstituents, it is to be understood that moieties having both carboncarbon double bonds and carbon carbon triple bonds (e.g., enynes) arealso encompassed.

The present invention will be more specifically illustrated withreference to the following examples. Many of these examples aredescribed in Rowley et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007 (129) 4948-4960 andin the supporting information published therewith. The entirety of thispublication and its supporting information are hereby incorporatedherein by reference.

EXAMPLES Example 1

This example describes our initial attempts to effect high yield singlereaction double carbonylation using catalysts and conditions we hadpreviously reported for ring-expansive epoxide and lactonecarbonylation. The results of these studies are summarized in Table 1,entries 1-4.

Although [(salph)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻ (2 in Chart 1 and 2a elsewhere inthe specification;salph=N,N′-bis(3,5-di-tert-butylsalicylidene)-1,2-phenylenediamine;THF=tetrahydrofuran) is the only catalyst which has been reported forboth epoxide (Getzler et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1174-1175)and β-lactone (Getzler et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6842-6843)carbonylation, these two independent reactions were found to beorthogonal, such that the reaction conditions, particularly solvent(vide infra), which facilitated the first carbonylation, severelylimited the second, and vice versa. For example, whereas lactoneformation was facile in neat epoxide (entry 1) or ether solvents;non-polar conditions which favor anhydride formation severely reducedepoxide carbonylation without leading to any anhydride (entry 2).

TABLE 1 Single reaction double carbonylation of 1-butene oxide.^(a)

product distribution (%) entry catalyst solvent lactone polymeranhydride 1 2 neat 99  — — 2 2 toluene 58^(b) — — 3 3 neat — 93  7 4 3toluene — 67 33 5 1 neat — 78 22 6 1 toluene — — 99 ^(a)Reactionconditions: 1.0 mol % catalyst, [epoxide] 1.8M in toluene or neat, 850psi CO, 6 h, 60° C. Product distribution determined by ¹H NMR spectra ofcrude reaction. ^(b)Remainder is starting epoxide.

[(OEP)Cr(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻ (3 in Chart 1 and 1o elsewhere in thespecification; OEP=octaethylporphyrinato), the most active catalystreported for epoxide carbonylation, was considered with the hope thatinhibition by a non-polar solvent would be mediated by the exceptionalactivity of the catalyst. Under typical conditions and catalyst loadings(<0.03 mol %), β-lactone was the only product observed for this system.However, significantly increasing the amount of catalyst to 1 mol %resulted in very rapid lactone formation, followed by slower conversionof lactone to low molecular weight poly(lactone) and a small amount ofanhydride (entry 3). Even under favorable (non-polar and diluted)conditions, polymer remains the major product (entry 4). Given thelackings of these previously reported catalysts, conditions, andpermutations thereof, it was clear that to effect high yield anhydrideformation, the efficient double carbonylation of epoxides would requireeither a new catalyst, a new solvent, or both.

The following examples describe exemplary catalyst/solvent combinationswhich we have shown can be used to effect high yield doublecarbonylation of epoxides. It is to be understood that thesecombinations are exemplary and that, in view of the representativeteachings that are provided in this disclosure, those skilled in the artwill be able to identify a variety of alternative combinations.

Example 2

This example describes an exemplary bimetallic catalyst[(ClTPP)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻ (1 in Chart 1 and 1c elsehwere in thespecification; ClTPP=meso-tetra(4-chlorophenyl)porphyrinato) whichrapidly catalyzed both epoxide and lactone carbonylation. While somelow-molecular-weight polymer was formed in the absence of solvent (Table1, entry 5), addition of solvent resulted in the first high yield singlereaction double carbonylation of epoxide to succinic anhydride (entry6).

Though double carbonylation proceeded at 25° C., increasing thetemperature to 90° C. accelerated the reaction without decreasingselectivity Anhydrides were formed cleanly at pressures as low as 100psi; however, at lower pressures and in the absence of CO, 1ccatalytically isomerizes epoxides to ketones.

In order to assess the impact of solvent on the rate of reaction, weattempted epoxide double carbonylation in a range of solvents.Conversion to succinic anhydride varied widely with solvent, asillustrated by a representative selection of solvents in FIG. 1. Hexanewas a poor solvent, yielding mostly polymer. Acyclic monofunctionalether solvents such as diethyl ether were effective for doublecarbonylation, though polymer remained a significant by-product.Moderately coordinating, cyclic or multifunctional ether solventsresulted in the cleanest reactions. In particular, the doublecarbonylation was distinctively rapid in 1,4-dioxane. Stronglycoordinating solvents such as acetonitrile severely inhibited lactonecarbonylation. Additional solvent experiments are described in theExamples that follow.

Example 3

This example describes other exemplary catalysts of the general form[(ligand)M(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻ which are capable of high yield doublecarbonylation in 1,4-dioxane (FIG. 2A). As shown in FIG. 2B, under theseconditions Cp₂Ti (Cp=cyclopentadienyl) only converted 6% of the epoxideto lactone, and made no anhydride. The only catalyst previously reportedfor epoxide and β-lactone carbonylation, (salph)Al (see also Example 1where it was tested in neat epoxide and toluene), was slow for doublecarbonylation. Interestingly, the chromium analog, (salph)Cr, was muchfaster than (salph)Al. (TPP)Cr and (OEP)Cr (see also Example 1 where itwas tested in neat epoxide and toluene) were also capable of yieldingsignificant amounts of anhydride though these porphyrin Cr complexesgave poly(lactone) as a significant byproduct. Significantly, thealuminum analogs, (TPP)Al and (OEP)Al gave much cleaner yields ofanhydride. Relative to the tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP) ligands, the moreelectron-donating octaethylporphyrin (OEP) ligand diminished theactivity of the Al complexes.

Among the catalysts we tested in 1,4-dioxane, tetraphenylporphyrinaluminum cations (Lewis acid component of catalyst) appeared to be themost effective for clean, catalytic, double carbonylation of epoxides tosuccinic anhydrides. A series of catalysts with substituted porphyrinphenyl rings were therefore synthesized(XTPP=meso-tetra(4-X-phenyl)porphyrinato). As shown in FIG. 2B, thissubstitution had little effect on the activity of the catalysts. Cl wasthe most economical para substituent, and this substitution impartedgreater crystallinity to the isolated complex.

Example 4

This example illustrates the versatility of the single reaction doublecarbonylation with a variety of functionalized epoxides (Table 2).Substrate to catalyst ratios were adjusted to achieve completeconversion of 1-2 mmol of epoxide in 3 h at 90° C.; longer reactiontimes were used if more than 2 mol % catalyst was required to completethe reaction in 3 h. Conversion to anhydride is reported to indicate thehigh selectivity of the reaction. In most cases, isolation isstraightforward, only requiring removal of solvent and catalyst. Asshown in Table 2, the reaction worked with ethylene oxide (4) andepoxides with pendant alkyl groups (entries 2-6). Substrates with etherside chains were less active, but high yields and selectivity wereretained (entries 7-9). Surprisingly, good conversion to anhydride wasobtained with an unprotected alcohol, although the presence ofincompatible alcohol and anhydride groups in the product results inlower isolated yields (entry 10). Ester functionality was well tolerated(entry 11), except in the case of glycidyl esters, where isomerizationto γ-lactone was favored over double carbonylation. Anhydrides withnitrile and amide side-chains were also synthesized in high yields(entries 12 and 13), although, in the presence of an amide,carbonylation of the lactone intermediate was very slow, presumably dueto competitive coordination with the Lewis acid. Epoxides with pendantalkenes exhibited varied activity depending on chain length (entries 14and 15). Aryl groups were also tolerated (entries 16 and 17), butstyrene oxide (36) was run at lower temperature for a longer time toavoid thermal decarboxylation of the lactone intermediate. Substrateswith more than one epoxide can undergo multiple double carbonylations;for example, 1,2,7,8-diepoxyoctane (38) was quadruply carbonylated togive the bis(succinic anhydride), 39, in good yield.

TABLE 2 Double carbonylation of functionalized epoxides.^(a) entryepoxide epoxide/1 anhydride yield (%)^(b) 1

1500

98 (93) 2

650

99 (89) 3

250

99 (80) 4

250

97 (88) 5

300

99 (93) 6

150

97 (82) 7

100

99 (80) 8

250

98 (83) 9

50

96 (87) 10

150

93 (72) 11

300

99 (89) 12

100

99 (77) 13

20

 98 (79)^(c) 14

50

 90 (82)^(c) 15

100

99 (85) 16

100

99 (78) 17

50

 93 (72)^(d) 18

150

98 (89) ^(a)Unless specified otherwise, reactions run for 3 h at 850 psiCO and 90 C. in 1,4-dioxane (1.8M epoxide). ^(b)Yield of anhydridedetermined by ¹H NMR spectroscopy of crude reaction mixture and verifiedby internal standard; corresponding lactone and ketone³¹ were the onlyother products detected. Unoptimized isolated yields in parentheses.^(c)[epoxide] = 1.0M at 90 C. for 24 h. ^(d)[epoxide] = 1.0M at 50 C.for 12 h.

1,2-Disubstituted epoxides were carbonylated to the correspondingsuccinic anhydrides with retention of relative stereochemistry.cis-Epoxides were carbonylated to cis-anhydrides via the trans-lactones,and trans-epoxides were carbonylated to the trans-anhydrides viacis-lactones (Table 3).

TABLE 3 Double carbonylation of disubstituted epoxides.^(a)

entry epoxide epoxide/1 anhydride yield (%)^(b) trans:cis^(b)  1^(c)

100

95  1:20 2

200

99 >100:1   3

75

99 >100:1   4

100

99 >100:1   ^(a)All reactions run for 24 h at 850 psi CO and 50° C. in1,4-dioxane (1.8M epoxide). ^(b)Conversion to anhydride and relativestereochemistry determined from the ¹H NMR spectroscopy of crudereaction mixture; lactone and ketone were the only other productsdetected. ^(c)[epoxide] = 1.0M in 1,4-dioxane.

At elevated temperatures, some epimerization of the anhydride occurredin the presence of catalyst; however, lower temperatures and thus longerreaction times afforded either cis- or trans-succinic anhydrides(entries 1 and 2) with good stereochemical purity. The cis-anhydride 41was not formed as easily as the trans-anhydride 43, and had to be run atlower concentration to avoid poly(lactone) formation. Increasing stericbulk decreased the rate of carbonylation, but relative stereochemicalpurity was preserved (entry 3). Using this reaction, a class of naturalproduct diacids are readily accessible via hydrolysis of unsymmetricalsuccinic anhydrides, such as 47.

TABLE 4 Double carbonylation of enantiomerically pure epoxides.^(a)entry epoxide ee (%) epoxide/1 T (° C.) anhydride yield (%)^(b) ee(%)^(c) 1

>99 650  90^(d)

97   97 2

>99 300 50

99 >99 3

>99 300 50

99 >99 4

>99 100 50

96 97 (>99)^(e) ^(a)Unless specified otherwise, reactions run for 24 hat 850 psi CO in 1,4-dioxane (1.8M epoxide). ^(b)Conversion to anhydridedetermined by ¹H NMR spectroscopy of reaction mixture; lactone andketone were the only other products detected. ^(c)Determined by chiralGC or HPLC of crude product. ^(d)Reaction run for 3 h. ^(e)Productrecrystallized from ether, 87% isolated yield.

Succinic anhydrides and succinate derivatives with excellentenantiomeric purity were readily accessed via double carbonylation(Table 4).

(S)-Methylsuccinic anhydride, (S)-7, was rapidly obtained from(R)-propylene oxide, (R)-6, with a slight loss of enantiomeric purity at90° C. (entry 1), but at 50° C., greater than 99% enantiomeric excess ismaintained through clean inversion of the stereocenter (entry 2).Likewise, larger alkyl and functionalized epoxides were carbonylated toyield anhydrides with ≧97% ee (entries 3-4). Thus, double carbonylationyields anhydrides as useful intermediates for asymmetric synthesis.

Example 5

This example describes experiments that were performed to furtherinvestigate the effects of solvent on the double carbonylation reactionwhen performed with catalyst 1c of Example 2. Propylene oxide (PO) wasreacted with carbon monoxide in a variety of solvents and the reactionwas monitored by in situ IR spectroscopy. For every solvent studied, thedouble carbonylation occurred in two distinct and non-overlappingstages; however, the rate of each stage varied greatly as a function ofsolvent.

As seen in FIG. 3, the rate of epoxide carbonylation slowed withincreasing sterics and decreasing donicity of the substituted THFsolvents: THF, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (MTHF),2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran (DMTHF). Similar activity was seen with themoderately donating tetrahydropyran (THP), 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME),and dioxane, but the reaction was very slow in poorly coordinatingtoluene and difluorobenzene (DFB).

For lactone carbonylation, the trend was found to be reversed,highlighting the differences between these two stages (FIG. 3). Thus,poorly coordinating solvents (DMTHF, DFB, and toluene) generallyresulted in uninhibited lactone ring opening; whereas the strongly Lewisbasic, coordinating solvents severely slowed anhydride formation, suchthat a low yield of anhydride was produced in THF.

Based on these results, we hypothesized that in order to find a solventsystem that has comparable rates for both carbonylations, a possiblesolution might be to use a mixture of solvents, or a solvent withintermediate donicity. For example, we have found that 1,4-dioxane isable to facilitate both epoxide and lactone carbonylation (FIG. 3).1,4-Dioxane was also found to be far more active than an optimizedmixture of the two solvent extremes.

The origin of the enhanced activity seen for both stages in 1,4-dioxanedoes not appear to result solely from its intermediate donicity.Instead, the low dipole moment of 1,4-dioxane appears to be anadditional factor. The importance of this solvent polarity, separatefrom donicity, is illustrated by comparing the rates of carbonylation inthe isomers of difluorobenzene (FIG. 3). In most respects ortho-, meta-,and para-difluorobenzene (o-DFB, m-DFB, p-DFB) are similar solvents,however they vary widely in polarity (ε=13, 5, and 2 respectively, seeWohlfarth, C. In CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; 76th ed.; Lide,D. R., Ed.; CRC Press: New York, 1995, pp 6-149), thus differences inrate in these solvents may be primarily attributed to the difference inpolarity of each isomer.

Epoxide carbonylation was comparably slow in all three DFB isomers, (asexpected from their poor donicity) with little change thus attributableto differences in polarity. Donicity appears to have a greater influencethan polarity on the rate of epoxide carbonylation. For lactonecarbonylation, however, markedly different rates are observed in eachisomer of DFB. o-DFB, the most polar isomer, is an extremely slowsolvent for lactone carbonylation; m-DFB is less polar and exhibits anincreased rate; and p-DFB is non-polar and the best isomer for rapidlactone carbonylation (FIG. 3). Based solely on their poor donicity, allthree isomers should be competent solvents for lactone carbonylation;instead we see a clear trend of increasing rate with decreasing solventpolarity.

To test this effect of polarity with dioxane, we predicted that1,3-dioxane (ε=13.6), which is significantly more polar than 1,4-dioxane(ε=2.2), would result in slow lactone carbonylation, comparable to theother more polar ether solvents. In fact, this was exactly what weobserved, confirming that non-polar solvents facilitate lactonecarbonylation (FIG. 3).

Overall, it appears that the rate of epoxide carbonylation is primarilydependent on solvent donicity; whereas, the rate of lactonecarbonylation is dependent on both solvent donicity and polarity.Without wishing to be limited to any particular theory, the ability of1,4-dioxane to function as a solvent for both epoxide and lactonecarbonylation may be explained in terms of its combination of theseproperties. It retains enough Lewis basic character to assist in ringclosing to form lactone, while not significantly inhibiting thesubsequent ring opening of lactone. Additionally, its low polarity doesnot retard epoxide carbonylation, but accelerates lactone carbonylation,due to a non-polar environment, which may favor the transition ofcatalyst from an ionic pair to a formally neutral intermediate upon ringopening of lactone. Thus, endowed with the proper combination ofdonicity and polarity, 1,4-dioxane enables the rapid and efficientdouble carbonylation of epoxides in the presence of various catalystsdescribed herein including catalyst 1c.

Example 6

This example describes experiments in which isobutylene oxide orα-butylene oxide were reacted with carbon monoxide in neat epoxide ortoluene in the presence of two different catalysts. Table 5 reports thecatalyst loading (expressed as molar ratio of epoxide to catalyst) andanhydride yield for each catalyst/solvent combination.

TABLE 5 Single reaction double carbonylation.^(a) entry epoxideligand^(b) solvent [catalyst] yield (%) 1 isobutylene oxide TMP neat 13158 2 isobutylene oxide TMP neat 519 37 3 α-butylene oxide TMP neat 11031 4 α-butylene oxide TMP neat 627 48 5 α-butylene oxide TMP toluene73 >95 6 α-butylene oxide ClTPP toluene 50 >95 ^(a)Reaction conditions:[epoxide] 1M (toluene), 890 psi CO, 1.5 h, 70-100 C. Productdistribution determined by ¹H NMR spectra of crude reaction.^(b)Catalyst = [(ligand)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻, TMP =tetramesitylporphyrin, ClTPP = meso-tetra(4-chlorophenyl)porphyrinato.

Example 7

This example describes experiments in which α-butylene oxide was reactedwith carbon monoxide in the presence of different amounts of 1,4-dioxaneand catalyst. Table 6 reports the catalyst loading (expressed as molarratio of epoxide to catalyst), solvent concentration (expressed as molarratio of solvent to epoxide) and anhydride yield for each experiment.Entries 1-3 show that increased catalyst loading leads to reduced yield.Entries 3-5 show that increased solvent concentration leads to increasedyield.

TABLE 6 Single reaction double carbonylation.^(a) entry epoxideligand^(b) solvent [catalyst] [solvent] yield (%) 1 a-butylene oxideClTPP 1,4-dioxane 500 6.24 74 2 a-butylene oxide ClTPP 1,4-dioxane 3046.24 85 3 a-butylene oxide ClTPP 1,4-dioxane 254 6.24 92 4 a-butyleneoxide ClTPP 1,4-dioxane 198 2.94 90 5 a-butylene oxide ClTPP 1,4-dioxane200 1.00 62 ^(a)Reaction conditions: 620 psi CO, 18 h, 90 C. Productdistribution determined by ¹H NMR spectra of crude reaction.^(b)Catalyst = [(ligand)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻, ClTPP =meso-tetra(4-chlorophenyl)porphyrinato.

Example 8

This example describes experiments in which α-butylene oxide was reactedwith carbon monoxide in 1,4-dioxane in the presence of differentcatalysts. Table 7 reports the catalyst loading (expressed as molarratio of epoxide to catalyst) and anhydride yield for each experiment.

TABLE 7 Single reaction double carbonylation.^(a) entry epoxideligand^(b) solvent [catalyst] yield (%) 1 α-butylene oxide ClTPP1,4-dioxane 511 71 2 α-butylene oxide MeTPP 1,4-dioxane 654 55 3α-butylene oxide FTPP 1,4-dioxane 509 78 ^(a)Reaction conditions:[epoxide] 1.8M, 500 psi CO, 2 h, 90 C. Product distribution determinedby ¹H NMR spectra of crude reaction. ^(b)Catalyst =[(ligand)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻, XTPP =meso-tetra(4-X-phenyl)porphyrinato.

Example 9

This example describes experiments in which α-butylene oxide was reactedwith carbon monoxide in different solvents in the presence of the samecatalyst. Table 8 reports the catalyst loading (expressed as molar ratioof epoxide to catalyst) and anhydride yield for each experiment.

TABLE 8 Single reaction double carbonylation.^(a) yield entry epoxideligand^(b) solvent [catalyst]^(c) (%)  1 α-butylene oxide ClTPP CH₃CN605 —  2 α-butylene oxide ClTPP CDCl₃ 500 —  3 α-butylene oxide ClTPP1,2-difluorobenzene 510 12  4 α-butylene oxide ClTPP hexane 500 16  5α-butylene oxide ClTPP acetone 505 17  6 α-butylene oxide ClTPPtetrahydrofuran 529 18  7 α-butylene oxide ClTPP cyclohexanone 500 18  8α-butylene oxide ClTPP 2-isopropoxypropane 500 36  9 α-butylene oxideClTPP ether 495 38 10 α-butylene oxide ClTPP ethyl acetate 500 42 11α-butylene oxide ClTPP 1,2-dimethoxyethane 509 43 12 α-butylene oxideClTPP methyl tert-butyl 500 43 ether 13 α-butylene oxide ClTPPtetrahydropyran 500 45 14 α-butylene oxide ClTPP toluene 540 47 15α-butylene oxide ClTPP diglyme 500 53 16 α-butylene oxide ClTPP1,4-dioxane 510 59 ^(a)Reaction conditions: [epoxide] 1.8M, 850-900 psiCO, 2 h, 90 C. Product distribution determined by ¹H NMR spectra ofcrude reaction. ^(b)Catalyst = [(ligand)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻, ClTPP =meso-tetra(4-chloropheny)porphyrinato. ^(c)Molar ratio of epoxide tocatalyst. For entries 2, 4, 7, 12, 13 and 15 these are the predicted,not actual values.

Example 10

This example describes experiments in which α-butylene oxide was reactedwith carbon monoxide in THF in the presence of a gallium based catalyst.Table 9 reports the catalyst loading (expressed as molar ratio ofepoxide to catalyst) and anhydride yield for each experiment.

TABLE 9 Single reaction double carbonylation.^(a) yield entry epoxideligand^(b) solvent [catalyst] (%) 1 α-butylene oxide TPP tetrahydrofuran200 14 2 α-butylene oxide TPP 1,2-dimethoxyethane 500 17 3 α-butyleneoxide TPP 1,4-dioxane 500 38 ^(a)Reaction conditions: [epoxide] 1.8M,600 psi CO, 2 h, 90 C. Product distribution determined by ¹H NMR spectraof crude reaction. Entry 1 was obtained with [epoxide] 1.5M, 800 psi CO,3 h, 90 C. ^(b)Catalyst = [(ligand)Ga(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻, TPP =tetraphenylporphyrin.

Example 11

The following example describes materials and general methods that wereused in some of the preceding examples.

Materials

Carbon monoxide (research grade) was purchased from Matheson and usedwithout further purification. 1,4-Dioxane, 1,3-dioxane, tetrahydropyran,tetrahydrofuran, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, 2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran,diethyl ether, and 1,2-dimethoxyethane were vacuum transferred frompurple Na/benzophenone. Hexanes and toluene were dried and deoxygenatedon columns of alumina and Q5 copper, respectively. Diethyl ether andmethylene chloride were dried on columns of alumina and degassed viarepetitive freeze-pump-thaw cycles (FPT). Difluorobenzene, ethylacetate, acetone, and acetonitrile were dried over 4 Å molecular sievesand vacuum transferred after FPT. Epoxides were stirred for one weekover CaH₂, degassed by FPT, and vacuum distilled, except10,11-epoxyundecan-1-ol (22) N,N-dimethyl-10,11-undecylamide (28), whichwere dried over CaH₂, filtered, and degassed by stirring under dynamicvacuum (0.1 torr). Ethylene oxide (4), propylene oxide (6),1,2-epoxybutane (8), 1,2-epoxyhexane (10), 1,2-epoxydodecane (12),n-butyl glycidyl ether (16), tert-butyldimethylsilyl glycidyl ether(18), benzyl glycidyl ether (20), 1,2-epoxy-5-hexene (30),1,2-epoxy-7-octene (32), (2,3-epoxypropyl)benzene (34), styrene oxide(36), 1,2,7,8-diepoxyoctane (38), β-propiolactone, β-butyrolactone(BBL), 4-nitrophenylisocyanate, and meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid(mCPBA) were purchased from Aldrich. cis-2,3-Epoxybutane (40), andtrans-2,3-epoxybutane (42), were purchased from GFS Chemicals.iso-Butylene oxide was purchased from TCI America. Co₂(CO)₈ andoctaethylporphyrin were purchased from Strem. (R)-Propylene oxide((R)-6), (S)-1,2-epoxyhexane ((S)-10), (R)-benzyl glycidyl ether((R)-20), 10,11-epoxyundecan-1-ol (22), 4,5-epoxypentyl butyrate (24),5,6-epoxyhexanenitrile (26), N,N-dimethyl-10,11-undecylamide (28),trans-3,4-epoxyhexane (44), trans-2,3-epoxyoctane (46), NaCo(CO)₄,[(salph)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻ (2), [(OEP)Cr(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻ (3), and[PPh₄]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻, were synthesized as previously reported in theliterature. All other materials were commercially available and used asreceived.

General Considerations

All manipulations of air- and/or water-sensitive compounds were carriedout under dry nitrogen using a Braun Unilab drybox or standard Schlenkline techniques. NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercuryspectrometer (¹H NMR, 300 MHz; ¹³C NMR, 75 MHz) and referenced versusresidual non-deuterated or monoprotonated solvent shifts. Standard IRspectra were collected on a Mattson RS-10500 Research Series FTIR. Insitu IR data were collected using a 100-mL Parr stainless steelhigh-pressure reactor modified for use with a Mettler-Toledo ReactIR4000 Reaction Analysis System fitted with a Sentinel™ DiComp™ HighPressure Probe, and analyzed with ReactIR software version 2.21.Enantiomeric excesses were measured using either an HP 6890 Series GCequipped with an Astec α-cyclodex column, TFA chiral capillary column(250 μm×60 m), or using chiral HPLC (Waters 515 HPLC pump, Waters 2410Refractive Index Detector, semi-prep Regis Pirkle (S,S) Whelk-O 1 column(25 cm×10 mm)). High-resolution mass spectra were obtained usingelectron impact conditions on a 70-VSE mass spectrometer by the MassSpectrometry Laboratory, School of Chemical Sciences, University ofIllinois. X-ray crystallographic data were collected using a Bruker X8APEX II (Mo K_(α), λ=0.71073 Å) at 173(2) K, and frames were integratedwith the Bruker SAINT+ Program. Optimization of catalyst loading wasperformed in custom designed and built six-well, stainless steel, highpressure reactors, which accommodated six 4- or 8-mL glass vials. Allhigh-pressure reactors were dried under vacuum at 90° C. prior to use.

General Procedure for the Small-Scale Carbonylation of Epoxides

A six-well, stainless steel, high pressure reactor was loaded with six4-mL glass vials and magnetic stir bars. In a nitrogen drybox, anappropriate amount of catalyst was weighed into each vial, then solventwas added to each, with no effort made to dissolve the catalyst. Epoxidewas weighed into the vials and the catalyst became soluble in thereaction mixture. Each vial was cooled in the drybox freezer at −37° C.for at least 5 min to limit ketone formation, then all were placed inthe reactor. The reactor was sealed and removed from the drybox,immediately pressured with CO, stirred, and heated to the appropriatetemperature. After the indicated time, the reactor was placed on dryice, cooled to <0° C., then slowly vented. Crude reaction mixture fromeach vial was analyzed by ¹H NMR spectroscopy in CDCl₃ to determineanhydride yields.

General Procedure for the Large-Scale Carbonylation of Epoxides

In a nitrogen drybox, a 100-mL Parr high pressure reactor was chargedwith the appropriate amount of catalyst and solvent, then removed fromthe drybox. The reactor was first pressured with 200 psi CO and stirredfor 10 min, then vented down to 20 psi without stirring. The epoxide wasinjected via gastight syringe into the CO-filled reactor through aseptum at room temperature. (This procedure of pre-saturating thesolution with CO eliminated ketone formation.) The reactor was thenimmediately pressured to the reaction CO pressure, followed by rapidstirring and heating to the reaction temperature. After the appropriatetime, the reactor was placed on dry ice, cooled to <0° C., and slowlyvented.

General Procedures for Anhydride Purification

In certain embodiments, anhydrides were purified from the crude reactionmixture. Anhydrides were obtained by rotary evaporation followed bybulb-to-bulb vacuum distillation (9, 11, 15, 37, 45, 47) or sublimation(5, 7, 39, 41, 43) of the crude reaction mixture. For higher boilinganhydrides, solvent and any volatile ketones were removed from the crudereaction mixture in vacuo. The catalyst residue was then removed fromthe resulting oil by elution through a 2″ plug of silica gel (with 1:2EtOAc:hexanes for 13, 17, 19, 21, 23, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, and with 4:1EtOAc:hexanes for 25). Subsequent concentration by rotary evaporationafforded the product, which could be further purified by vacuumdistillation or recrystallization from cold ether/hexane, asappropriate. Anhydrides were stable enough to be isolated andcharacterized, but reacted slowly with moisture to give thecorresponding diacids.

Example 12

The following example describes synthetic procedures for certaincatalysts used in the preceding examples.

Synthesis of [Cl(TPP)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻, (1c)

This and related catalysts may be commercially available fromSigma-Aldrich. According to the method of Adlermeso-tetra(4-chlorophenyl)-21H,23H-porphyrin (ClTPPH₂) was easilysynthesized from pyrrole and 4-chlorobenzaldehyde, and dried undervacuum overnight (Adler et al., J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 476). Allsubsequent manipulations were performed using strict air-freetechniques, and all reagents and solvents were dried and degassed priorto use. Using a modified literature procedure (Konishi et al., J. Org.Chem. 1990, 55, 816-820), ClTPPH₂ (3.44 g, 4.57 mmol) was placed in aSchlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir-bar in a drybox. Upon removalto the bench top, the dark purple ligand was dissolved in 250 mL ofCH₂Cl₂ to form a very dark red solution. Diethyl aluminum chloride (5.0mL, 5.0 mmol, 1.0 M in heptane, 1.1 equiv) was added via syringe througha septum under flow of N₂. Ethane evolved from the reaction and wasvented. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 3 h, thensolvent was removed in vacuo. The residual red-purple solid was driedunder vacuum overnight and identified by comparison of its ¹H NMRspectrum (CDCl₃, 300 MHz, δ): 9.10 (s, 8H), 8.13 (broad d, 8H), 7.76 (m,8H), to that of free ligand: (CDCl₃, 300 MHz, δ): 8.92 (s, 8H), 7.88 (d,8H, ³J=8.2 Hz), 7.49 (d, 8H, ³J=8.2 Hz), 2.19 (s, 2H, NH). Havingreacted quantitatively, it was used without further purification. TheSchlenk tube was brought into a drybox where NaCo(CO)₄ (887 mg, 4.57mmol) was added. Upon removal to the Schlenk line, the solids weredissolved in 200 mL THF and stirred overnight at room temperature. Thevery dark, red-purple solution was concentrated to 100 mL in vacuo, andNaCl was allowed to precipitate. The solution was then filtered andlayered with 200 mL hexanes. Slow diffusion over the course of a fewdays afforded large, purple, x-ray quality crystals that were stableunder N₂ for over a year. (Intentional mixing of the layers results inrapid precipitation of the complex as a crystalline powder withcomparable catalytic activity and selectivity). The crystals werefiltered, washed with hexanes, and dried in vacuo (4.33 g, 87% yield).¹H NMR (300 MHz, THF-d₈, δ): 9.23 (s, 8H), 8.21 (m, 8H), 7.88 (m, 8H),3.62 (m, 8H), 1.78 (m, 8H); IR (Nujol, NaCl) v_(C═O)=1875 cm⁻¹. Crystaldata: monoclinic, space group P2₁/n, a=11.9296(6) Å, b=22.6420(12) Å,c=20.4696(10) Å, α=90°, β=102.446(2)°, γ=90°, V=5399.1(5) Å³; Z=4,formula weight=1092.63 for C₄₈H₂₄AlCl₄CoN₄O₄.2C₄H₈O and density(calc.)=1.344 g/mL; R=0.0593, R_(w)=0.1634 (I>2σ(I)).

Synthesis of [Cl(TPP)Al(THF)₂]⁺[BPh₄]⁻

The synthetic procedure was identical to that for 1c, except that NaBPh₄was used in place of NaCo(CO)₄. The structure was confirmed by X-raycrystallography.

Synthesis of [(OEP)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻

The synthetic procedure was identical to that for 1c, but used thecommercially available octaethylporphyrin ligand. Starting from OEPligand (175 mg, 327 μmol) the complex was synthesized as dark redcrystals (195 mg, 68%). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, C₆D₆, δ): 10.56 (s, 4H), 4.12(q, 16H), 1.92 (t, 24H), −1.42 (br s, 8H), −2.64 (br s, 8H); IR (Nujol,NaCl) v_(C═O)=1885 cm⁻¹. Structure was confirmed by X-raycrystallography, and is isostructural with [(OEP)Cr(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻.

Synthesis of [(MeTPP)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]−

The synthetic procedure was identical to that for 1c, but employed4-methylbenzaldehyde in porphyrin ligand synthesis. Frommeso-tetra(4-methylphenyl)porphyrin (671 mg, 1.00 mmol) the complex wasisolated as dark purple crystalline solid (680 mg, 67%). ¹H NMR (300MHz, C₆D₆, δ): 9.19 (s, 8H), 8.15 (m, 8H), 7.40 (m, 8H), 2.39 (s, 12H);IR (Nujol, NaCl) v_(C═O)=1880 cm⁻¹.

Synthesis of [(TPP)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻

The synthetic procedure was identical to that for 1c, but employedbenzaldehyde in porphyrin ligand synthesis. From tetraphenylporphyrin(1.45 g, 2.37 mmol) the complex was isolated as dark purple crystallineplates (2.16 g, 95%). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, C₆D₆, δ): 9.08 (s, 8H), 8.17 (m,8H), 7.52 (m, 12H), 3.38 (br s, 8H), 1.18 (br s, 8H); IR (Nujol, NaCl)v_(C═O)=1875 cm⁻¹.

Synthesis of [(FTPP)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻

The synthetic procedure was identical to that for 1c, but employed4-fluorobenzaldehyde in porphyrin ligand synthesis. Frommeso-tetra(4-fluorophenyl)porphyrin (410 mg, 0.597 mmol) the complex wasisolated as dark purple crystals (340 mg, 66%). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, THF-d₈,δ): 9.21 (s, 8H), 8.21 (m, 8H), 7.42 (m, 8H), 3.58 (m, 8H), 1.74 (m,8H); IR (Nujol, NaC) v_(C═O)=1875 cm⁻¹.

Synthesis of [(CF₃TPP)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻

The synthetic procedure was identical to that for 1c, but employed4-trimethylfluorobenzaldehyde in porphyrin ligand synthesis. Frommeso-tetra(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)porphyrin (242 mg, 0.273 mmol) thecomplex was isolated as dark purple crystalline solid (258 mg, 81%). IR(Nujol, NaCl) v_(C═O)=1876 cm⁻¹.

Synthesis of Various Catalysts

[Cp₂Ti(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻ was synthesized as described in Mahadevan etal., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2781-2784.

[(salph)Al(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻, (2a) was synthesized as described inGetzler et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1174-1175.

[(salph)Cr(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻ was synthesized as described in Kramer etal., Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3709-3712.

[(TPP)Cr(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻ was synthesized as described in Schmidt etal., Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 373-376.

[(OEP)Cr(THF)₂]⁺[Co(CO)₄]⁻, (1o), was synthesized as described inSchmidt et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11426-11435.

OTHER EMBODIMENTS

Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled inthe art from a consideration of the specification or practice of theinvention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification andExamples be considered as exemplary only, with the true scope of theinvention being indicated by the following claims. The contents of anyreference that is referred to herein are hereby incorporated byreference in their entirety.

What is claimed is:
 1. A process for the double carbonylation of anepoxide to succinic anhydride in a reaction which comprises reacting anepoxide, where the epoxide is ethylene oxide, with carbon monoxide in asolvent in the presence of a catalytically effective amount of acatalyst, where the catalyst comprises a Lewis acid in combination witha transition metal carbonyl complex, where the Lewis acid is of thefollowing formula:

where: M is aluminum; R^(d) at each occurrence is independently selectedfrom the group consisting of: —H; C₁-C₁₂ alkyl; C₂-C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂-C₁₂alkynyl; halogen; —OR¹⁰; —OC(O)R¹³; —OC(O)OR¹³; —OC(O)NR¹¹R¹²; —CN;—CNO; —C(O)R¹³; —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); —C(O)OR¹³; —C(O)NR¹¹R¹²; —NR¹¹R¹²;—NR¹¹C(O)R¹⁰; —NR¹¹C(O)OR¹³; —NR¹¹SO₂R¹³; —NCO; —N₃; —NO₂; —S(O)_(x)R¹³;—SO₂NR¹¹R¹²; —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); —(CH₂)_(k)R¹⁴; —(CH₂)_(k)-Z-R¹⁶—; and—(CH₂)_(k)-Z-(CH₂)_(m)-R¹⁴, and R¹⁰ at each occurrence is independentlyselected from the group consisting of: —C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); C₁ to C₁₂alkyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkynyl; up to a C₁₂ carbocycle;—S(O)₂R¹³; —Si(R¹⁵)₃; —H; and a hydroxyl protecting group, R¹¹ and R¹²at each occurrence are independently selected from the group consistingof: —H; C₁ to C₁₂ alkyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkynyl; and—C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); where R¹¹ and R¹²; when both present, canoptionally be taken together with the atom to which they are attached toform a 3- to 10-membered ring, R¹³ at each occurrence is independentlyselected from the group consisting of: —H; C₁ to C₁₂ alkyl; C₂ to C₁₂alkenyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkynyl; and up to a C₁₂ carbocycle, R¹⁴ at eachoccurrence is independently selected from the group consisting of:halogen; —OR¹⁰; —OC(O)R¹³; —OC(O)OR¹³; —OC(O)NR¹¹R¹²; —CN; —CNO;—C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)); —C(O)R¹³; —C(O)OR¹³; —C(O)NR¹¹R¹²; —NR¹¹C(O)R¹³;—NR¹¹C(O)OR¹⁰; —NR¹¹SO₂R¹³; —NCO; —N₃; —NO₂; —S(O)_(x)R¹³; —SO₂NR¹¹R¹²;and up to a C₁₂ carbocycle, R¹⁵ at each occurrence is independentlyselected from the group consisting of: C₁ to C₆ alkyl; C₂ to C₆ alkenyl;C₂ to C₆ alkynyl; and up to a C₁₂ carbocycle, R¹⁶ at each occurrence isindependently selected from the group consisting of: C₁ to C₁₂ alkyl; C₂to C₁₂ alkenyl; C₂ to C₁₂ alkynyl; up to a C₁₂ carbocycle; and—C(R¹³)_(z)H_((3-z)), Z is a divalent linker selected from the groupconsisting of: —(CH═CH)_(a)—; —(CH≡CH)_(a)—; —C(O)—; —C(═NOR¹¹)—;—C(═NNR¹¹R¹²)—; —O—; —N(R¹¹)—; —N(C(O)R¹³)—; and —S(O)_(x)—, a is 1, 2,3, or 4, k is an integer from 1 to 8 inclusive, m is an integer from 1to 8 inclusive, x is 0, 1, or 2, z is 1, 2, or 3; and where the solventincludes a Lewis base and the crude yield of succinic anhydride is atleast 10 percent.
 2. The process of claim 1, where R^(d) at eachoccurrence is independently selected from the group consisting of: —Hand C₁-C₁₂ alkyl.
 3. The process of claim 1, where the Lewis acidincludes one or more neutral coordinating ligands.
 4. The process ofclaim 1, where the Lewis acid includes one or more tetrahydrofuranligands.
 5. The process of claim 1, where the transition metal carbonylcomplex is a monoanionic carbonyl complex of a metal from groups 5, 7 or9.
 6. The process of claim 5, where the transition metal carbonylcomplex contains cobalt, manganese or rhodium.
 7. The process of claim6, where the transition metal carbonyl complex contains cobalt.
 8. Theprocess of claim 6, where the catalyst includes a transition metalcarbonyl complex of formula [Co(CO)₄]⁻.
 9. The process of claim 1, wherethe Lewis acid is cationic and the transition metal carbonyl complex isanionic.
 10. The process of claim 1, where the catalyst comprises acomplex of formula 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e or 1f:


11. The process of claim 10, where the catalyst comprises a complex offormula 1c.
 12. The process of claim 1, where the catalyst comprises acomplex of formula 1g:


13. The process of claim 1, where the catalyst comprises a complex offormula 1a:


14. The process of claim 1, where the reaction is performed in a vesseland the catalyst was formed in situ by adding the Lewis acid and thetransition metal carbonyl complex to the vessel.
 15. The process ofclaim 1, where the solvent includes a Lewis base with the same polarityas 1,4-dioxane.
 16. The process of claim 1, where the solvent includes aLewis base with lower electron donicity than tetrahydrofuran.
 17. Theprocess of claim 1, where the solvent includes a Lewis base with thesame electron donicity as 1,4-dioxane.
 18. The process of claim 1, wherethe solvent includes 1,4-dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, tetrahydropyran,dimethoxyethane, glyme, diethyl ether, t-butyl methyl ether,2,5-dimethyl tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, butylacetate, acetone, 2-butanone, cyclohexanone, toluene, acetonitrile,difluorobenzene, or a combination thereof.
 19. The process of claim 1,where the solvent includes 1,4-dioxane, toluene, dimethoxyethane, or acombination thereof.
 20. The process of claim 1, where the solventincludes 1,4-dioxane.
 21. The process of claim 1, where the solventincludes a mixture of two or more solvents.
 22. The process of claim 1,where the solvent includes a mixture of 1,4-dioxane and toluene.
 23. Theprocess of claim 1, where the solvent and epoxide are the same.
 24. Theprocess of claim 1, where the reaction is conducted under a carbonmonoxide pressure from about 40 psi to about 2500 psi.
 25. The processof claim 1, where the crude yield of succinic anhydride is at least 80%.26. The process of claim 1, where the crude yield of succinic anhydrideis at least 90%.
 27. The process of claim 1, where the crude yield ofsuccinic anhydride is at least 95%.